Open critique of Michael Shermer's article "Are Paleo Diets More Natural than GMOs?" published in Scientific American magazine: Review, open critique, and resource of abstracts and full-text articles Book PDF, ePub eBook

Join our eBook service for unlimited books & audiobooks. Get a free 7 day subscription! ↓↓↓↓↓


Book Descriptions:
Scientific American magazine describes itself as "the leading source and authority for science, technology information and policy for a general audience", published in 14 language editions worldwide, with a worldwide audience of more than 5 million people; "a third of Scientific American readers hold postgraduate degrees." As such, Scientific American magazine has a social responsibility and moral obligation to provide accurate reporting at a level consistent with its educated, aspiring, and influential readership. Scientific American has a responsibility to the public via its influence on public discourse on topics of importance. Per the example herein, Scientific American magazine has not simply failed to provide accurate and meaningful information, but the magazine has intentionally confused several important topics and then blocked scientific and scholarly dialog on the topic, thereby ensuring that readers would be confused and misinformed. Corrective comments and reasonable critiques of this Scientific American article were administratively blocked. The blockade of feedback, discussion, and correction is itself antiscientific; thus, Scientific American magazine has blocked the peer-review process which underlies the integrity of the scientific process. This critique demonstrates the paradoxical antiscience of Scientific American magazine, implicating poor leadership and demonstrating irresponsible behavior toward its readership and the public. The Editors of Scientific American published this drivel at the expense of their readership and at the expense of good taste and good science, leaving the trustworthiness of the editorial review process at Scientific American not simply in doubt, but in ruin. By failing to reject tabloid-level submissions, and by failing to maintain standards of writing quality and scientific integrity, the Editors of Scientific American have demoted their magazine to one that is unreliable as a guarantor of accurate information and scholarly discourse.

Open critique of Michael Shermer's article "Are Paleo Diets More Natural than GMOs?" published in Scientific American magazine: Review, open critique, and resource of abstracts and full-text articles by Anonymous Scientists

From reader reviews:

Joshua Bush:

The knowledge that you get from Open critique of Michael Shermer's article "Are Paleo Diets More Natural than GMOs?" published in Scientific American magazine: Review, open critique, and resource of abstracts and full-text articles could be the more deep you rooting the information that hide within the words the more you get serious about reading it. It doesn't mean that this book is hard to understand but Open critique of Michael Shermer's article "Are Paleo Diets More Natural than GMOs?" published in Scientific American magazine: Review, open critique, and resource of abstracts and full-text articles giving you thrill feeling of reading. The author conveys their point in a number of way that can be understood by means of anyone who read it because the author of this reserve is well-known enough. This particular book also makes your own vocabulary increase well. So it is easy to understand then can go along, both in printed or e-book style are available. We propose you for having this particular Open critique of Michael Shermer's article "Are Paleo Diets More Natural than GMOs?" published in Scientific American magazine: Review, open critique, and resource of abstracts and full-text articles instantly.

Kenneth Salinas:

This book untitled Open critique of Michael Shermer's article "Are Paleo Diets More Natural than GMOs?" published in Scientific American magazine: Review, open critique, and resource of abstracts and full-text articles to be one of several books this best seller in this year, that's because when you read this publication you can get a lot of benefit in it. You will easily to buy that book in the book retailer or you can order it through online. The publisher of the book sells the e-book too. It makes you quicker to read this book, as you can read this book in your Smartphone. So there is no reason for you to past this reserve from your list.

Michael Vines:

Often the book Open critique of Michael Shermer's article "Are Paleo Diets More Natural than GMOs?" published in Scientific American magazine: Review, open critique, and resource of abstracts and full-text articles will bring you to definitely the new experience of reading the book. The author style to elucidate the idea is very unique. If you try to find new book to study, this book very suited to you. The book Open critique of Michael Shermer's article "Are Paleo Diets More Natural than GMOs?" published in Scientific American magazine: Review, open critique, and resource of abstracts and full-text articles is much recommended to you to study. You can also get the e-book from official web site, so you can easier to read the book.

Caroline Hagemann:

Playing with family in a park, coming to see the marine world or hanging out with pals is thing that usually you could have done when you have spare time, then why you don't try matter that really opposite from that. One activity that make you not sensation tired but still relaxing, trilling like on roller coaster you are ride on and with addition of knowledge. Even you love Open critique of Michael Shermer's article "Are Paleo Diets More Natural than GMOs?" published in Scientific American magazine: Review, open critique, and resource of abstracts and full-text articles, you could enjoy both. It is fine combination right, you still would like to miss it? What kind of hangout type is it? Oh can occur its mind hangout guys. What? Still don't get it, oh come on its identified as reading friends.